ChallengeS

  • Needed to implement a standardised, global Target Operating Model using best practice financial processes.
  • Looking to reduce costs by redefining and restructuring their solution architecture.
  • Using a legacy Microsoft Navision solution. 
  • Were looking for a comparison between a re-implementation using Dynamics 365 Business Central or making a move to Dynamics 365 F&SCM.

APPROACH

  • Finance Team at Head Office completed survey.
  • Funded by Microsoft ECIF

RESULTS

  • Timings:

    • 3 weeks (end-to-end).
    • Completed their part in 2 weeks.

    Outcomes:

    • Comparison report and executive summary presentation.
    • Detailed requirements, fit-gap analysis, breakdown of likely costings, timings & license requirements and timelines for each approach.
    • Decision made on Dynamics 365 F&SCM – fit-gap was strong for both solutions.
    • Licensing discussions are ongoing with Microsoft.

Gyde365 Success Story Atg 875x458

 

CHALLENGES

  • Wanted to Implement a standardised, global Target Operating Model using best practice financial processes.
  • Were looking to reduce costs by redefining and restructuring their solution architecture.
  • Were using a legacy Microsoft Navision solution. 
  • Needed a comparison between a re-implementation using Dynamics 365 Business Central or making a move to Dynamics 365 F&SCM.
 

APPROACH

  • Finance Team at Head Office completed survey.
  • Funded by Microsoft ECIF.
 

RESULTS

Timings:

  • 3 weeks (end-to-end).
  • Completed their part in 2 weeks.

Outcomes:

  • Comparison report and executive summary presentation.
  • Detailed requirements, fit-gap analysis, breakdown of likely costings, timings & license requirements and timelines for each approach.
  • Decision made on Dynamics 365 F&SCM – fit-gap was strong for both solutions.
  • Licensing discussions are ongoing with Microsoft.